Szwaja's Sports Blog

Monday, November 28, 2005

One of the first things you learn in Journalism 150 is that you're not supposed to interview your friends. Looking back on it, that wasn't really bad advice. As a young journalist looking to make your mark, you have to branch out and really get into the minds of strangers. You can't make it by talking to your roommate, your roommate's aunt and your biology TA. That said, I'm totally against completely outlawing interviewing friends. Sometimes friends can offer great insight. And other times, more importantly, you have to consider the built-in level of respect that can come with sitting down to speak with a friend.

I can illustrate that point by detailing Dan Patrick's interview with Michael Irvin on Monday afternoon during Patrick's radio show. Patrick and Irvin are friends. Both work for ESPN, and Irvin makes frequent appearances on the show. He even has his own intro that goes something like this, "It's time for the Playmaker on the Dan Patrick Radio Show..." As we all read over this past weekend, Irvin was arrested in Texas on Friday for possession of drug paraphanalia, more specifically, a crack pipe.

Usually, Patrick and Irvin talk about the weekend's games, the Monday night game and the upcoming weekend's games. Not Monday. Monday they talked about how that crack pipe ended up under the driver seat of Irvin's car. The Playmaker went on to tell this sappy story about his friend who has been battling drug addiction and how he took the pipe from this friend when he found it on him. He said he was planning on throwing it into the Dumpster at the grocery store because in Dallas if you're a celebrity, "people check your garbage," Irvin said. After Irvin finished telling his story, which sounded more like the script for a made for TV movie, Patrick said what no other journalist could have said.

He sat silent for a moment, and as a listener, I envisioned Patrick just staring at Irvin, who was there in the studio with Patrick. Then Patrick went into a story of his own, a story that revealed his father was an alcoholic who always seemed to have an excuse or some other reason why he needed to drink. He then told Irvin he couldn't believe that story unless Irvin went straight to the ESPN drug testing center and took the test to clear his name.

"I'll do everything I can to clear my name, Dan," Irvin said.

"So you're going to take the test?" Patrick asked.

"I don't know the legalities, Dan," Irvin said. "I'll have to call my lawyer."

Translation: I don't want to take a chance, Dan. I could very well fail that test.

Patrick put on the press. He wanted Irvin to agree to take that test, and Irvin wasn't ready to bite. Then, seemingly without any reason to do so, Irvin tried to justify his past (and present?) drug problems. He went off on this tangent about what he called a "generational curse," which he said is detailed in the Bible. He noted that his father, his uncles, his brother and he himself have been subjected to this curse, because all have had drug problems. He said there was nothing any of them could have done about it. He noted that this "generational curse" is explained in the Bible. More on this later...

Anyway, Irvin left the studio and Patrick wasn't finished. He mentioned to Keith Olberman, who now appears on the show every day starting at one o'clock, that he wanted to believe Irvin but simply couldn't. He again mentioned his father, and took it a step further.

"Alcoholics and druggies are the best liars in the world," Patrick said.

He went on to explain that people with drug addictions always have an excuse, that they always have someone or something else to blame for their problems. Without even knowing it, Irvin dug himself an even deeper hole with his faith-based story. Suddenly, it wasn't his fault he was a druggie. It was some hereditary defect that's explained in the Bible. He had no control over himself, there was no stopping him. Sounds to me like Irvin's still got problems.

The point I opened this blog with was that it's not wrong in certain situations for friends to interview friends in journalistic settings. I like that point, but it's not why I decided to sit down and write this blog. I'm not a Michael Irvin fan. I hate Jerry Jones. I hate the Cowboys. I hate their stupid uniforms. I didn't mind Emmit Smith until he broke the career touchdown record, ripped off his helmet in the endzone and posed for the cameramen, which is the reason why, to this day, NFL players cannot voluntarily remove their helmets while on the field without being assessed a 15-yard penalty. So, yeah, I hate Smith. I hate that stadium. I hate the stupid mascot. I just don't like 'dem Cowboys.

And even though I hate the Cowboys, Irvin's appearance on the Dan Patrick Radio Show would make my stomach turn no matter who was talking into that mic. There's no doubt in my mind after hearing Irivn's excuses that he's still on drugs. I'm sure there are thousands, millions of people out there that just can't give it up like Irvin. But none of those people talk to me in the form of football programs on ESPN every weekend. I don't have any type of connection to those people like I have with Irvin. He's my example. And as bad as it sounds, I look at and listen to Irvin and think, I'm never going to let any drug screw me up like drugs have screwed this guy up. It's kind of like that movie Blow. I remember guys in high school who everyone knew did the magic snow plastering the movie poster up inside their lockers because they loved the movie. I always found that kind of ironic because that movie's message was that drugs screw you up more than you can imagine. After I saw Blow, I promised myself never to touch the stuff. It inspired me to stay clean. Now, I never considered doing cocaine or any drug before I saw the film, but that movie sealed the deal: never, under any circumstance, would I do drugs. Michael Irvin reinvigorated that sentiment on Monday.

Irvin is the only one fooling himself. Current druggie or not, he still doesn't get it. He's blaming his problems on some curse that is he says is in the Bible. How whacky does that sound? Like I said before, I can't stand Michael Irvin, but he serves his purpose. Just listening to him talk about his drug problem is the perfect example of how bad drugs can mess with your mind. Stay cool, my friends.


  • Make no mistake: Our mission at Tip Top Equities is to sift through the thousands of underperforming companies out there to find the golden needle in the haystack. A stock worthy of your investment. A stock with the potential for big returns. More often than not, the stocks we profile show a significant increase in stock price, sometimes in days, not months or years. We have come across what we feel is one of those rare deals that the public has not heard about yet. Read on to find out more.

    Nano Superlattice Technology Inc. (OTCBB Symbol: NSLT) is a nanotechnology company engaged in the coating of tools and components with nano structured PVD coatings for high-tech industries.

    Nano utilizes Arc Bond Sputtering and Superlattice technology to apply multi-layers of super-hard elemental coatings on an array of precision products to achieve a variety of physical properties. The application of the coating on industrial products is designed to change their physical properties, improving a product's durability, resistance, chemical and physical characteristics as well as performance. Nano's super-hard alloy coating materials were especially developed for printed circuit board drills in response to special market requirements

    The cutting of circuit boards causes severe wear on the cutting edge of drills and routers. With the increased miniaturization of personal electronics devices the dimensions of holes and cut aways are currently less than 0.2 mm. Nano coats tools with an ultra thin coating (only a few nanometers in thickness) of nitrides which can have a hardness of up to half that of diamond. This has proven to increase tool life by almost ten times. Nano plans to continue research and development into these techniques due to the vast application range for this type of nanotechnology

    We believe that Nano is a company on the move. With today�s steady move towards miniaturization we feel that Nano is a company with the right product at the right time. It is our opinion that an investment in Nano will produce great returns for our readers.

    Online Stock trading, in the New York Stock Exchange, and Toronto Stock Exchange, or any other stock market requires many hours of stock research. Always consult a stock broker for stock prices of penny stocks, and always seek proper free stock advice, as well as read a stock chart. This is not encouragement to buy stock, but merely a possible hot stock pick. Get a live stock market quote, before making a stock investment or participating in the stock market game or buying or selling a stock option.

    By Blogger matthewingals9112, at 2:23 AM  

  • I read over your blog, and i found it inquisitive, you may find My Blog interesting. My blog is just about my day to day life, as a park ranger. So please Click Here To Read My Blog

    By Blogger eddhunor11205173, at 3:02 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home